How To Get Female/Minority Characters Right?

That’s the kind of bullshit question you find lying around the Internet, assorted with bullshit answers, most of the time.

Behind that question lies the notion that, if you’re a male writer, you’re supposed to find it hard to “get female characters right”, or if you’re white you should have trouble “getting the African-American characters right”. Strangely, fewer people worry that female writings won’t get male characters right, or that black writers won’t get white characters right. Why is that, you wonder? Well, because that notion is laced with sexism and racism.

So, let’s get that idiocy out of the way and make it clear: there’s no such thing as a woman or a black person. There’s an assload of both, and they’re all unique. They’re not bound to a mold.

Now, I hear you arguing that, as a guy with a bachelor’s degree in sociology, I should know better. Of course, I do. Humans are walking clichés. Each of us, we play the part we were assigned, with most of the attributes of that role. The housewife, the unemployed writer, the cop, whatever. And yes, each of these roles come with very recognizable characteristics. Woman, black, Asian, Jew, white, artist… all of these are pretty recognizable, and not just because of gender or ethnicity or the way they dress (yes, artists dress funny when they’re overcompensating).

My point is, as a writer, you don’t have to worry about all that. You’re not making a documentary, and unless the very theme of your novel is one or several of these archetypes, you shouldn’t worry about “getting them right”. Your female character mustn’t be consistent with a majority of real-world women. She must be consistent with herself, with your vision of her. Once more, it comes down to your voice—your commanding, authorly voice.

Same goes with minorities. I’m from a minority (I’m gay), so I have first hand experience with that. There’s no such thing as “getting a gay character right”. Maybe I won’t like your gay character. Maybe he will piss me off, and I will wish he was never written because of how he makes gay people look. But that’s just me, and that shouldn’t be any of your concern. If that’s how you see your gay character, and he’s consistent internally, then it’s fine, regardless of what I or other gays think.

Also, don’t worry whether your gay character is too clichéd or not. Gay people, in real life, can be living and breathing clichés. That’s the very reason why there are clichés: they’re real, they’re among us. That’s how people settle in their role: they don clichés like they don uniforms. It’s a normal process, and you shouldn’t be ashamed of depicting it. As I wrote the other day, originality is not the rabbit you should be chasing. Be true to your voice, and everything will be fine.

Write your character as you think they should be, not as you think other people expect them to be. Because if you try to please everybody, you will fail. Just try to please yourself and your Ideal Reader. Be sincere and be honest. Authenticity comes from you; it doesn’t come to you.

Leave a Comment

Filed under blog

NaNoWriMo Update

By the way, I totally forgot to say: I won NaNoWriMo, yay! I finished the first draft of the novel on November 30th, and it’s around 55,000 words. I’m not happy with it, but it’s to be expected. I’ll let it rest a while and (probably next January) I’ll pick it up again and reread it, to see if it’s worth rewriting and edit and stuff.

The story is in French, and it’s about a werewolf who lives in Brussels, which is (believe me) the less supernatural city in the world. I wanted it to be funny like Spacejet, and well, it’s not. It’s actually kind of dark. There’s some humor in it, but some of the themes and twists are really sad. I cried—seriously!

Anyway, I’m glad I did it and I’m proud of this achievement, but damn, I’m glad it’s over. Now I can concentrate on the final proofreading round for Spacejet. I must get it ready on time, dammit! And I will.

Leave a Comment

Filed under blog

How Others Shape Who We Are

All your life, people are going to tell you who you are, what you can do, and what you should do, and it’s pointless to try to spot them. It’s not a bug, it’s a feature. We humans are social beasties, and social control is necessary to ensure group cohesion. We, however, are not just animals. We have introduced something new to the equation (and contrary to what most people think, it’s a recent development): we invented individuality.

We grew up hearing a lot of talk about “being ourselves”, but what does it really mean in a society that still has strong social control? Methinks, it means: “be yourself within the acceptable spectrum of variations, or face the consequences”. Every time you hear somebody telling you that “you are X”, regardless of whether X is good or bad, they are defining you. More importantly, they are limiting you.

As I said, it’s a normal part of being a social human, but just take a minute to recall some of the times you heard people telling you “you are X” or “you are (not) good at X” or even “I love it when you X”. Basically, they are stating their expectations. They expect you to behave in a certain way, good or bad, and if you don’t, it will affect them to various degrees.

At some points in life, when we are not well and more fragile, that social control can turn into social pressure, and it can get pretty overwhelming. I remember, at times, it felt as if I were about to blow. When teenagers are “acting up”, they are rebelling against what the people around them expect them to be (whatever that may be). It could be nothing more than perceived expectations, but it is enough to put pressure on an already vulnerable person.

Is social control always bad? Of course not. Most of the time, it’s what keeps you and me from being horrible, selfish nuisances. Long before we develop a sense of morality (a sense of what’s good and what’s evil), social control prevents us from doing bad things. Actually, it’s social control that teaches us good from bad. It’s how we become moral individuals. But it can be stifling at times, too.

If you feel overwhelmed by other people’s expectations, just bail. Take a week off. Travel by yourself to a place where nobody knows you, either another town or another country if you can afford it. Try out a new skin, a new name, new habits. Be another person. Test yourself. Be alone with no one to look at you with knowing, expectant eyes. Every single person you will meet will take you for what you tell them you are, and soon, you will start learning things about yourself. You will be free, for a while.

We are part of a family and a group of friends, but if we want to be individuals with unique personalities, we have to learn to be alone. We must silence others to let our inner voice speak, and with time, we will learn to listen. Then, we will find out that the inner voice was in fact the loudest and the truest.

All our lives, people are going to tell us who we are and what we can or cannot do. At some point, we have to stop listening to them. That’s how we grow.

Leave a Comment

Filed under blog

“Spacejet” Character Introduction (2)

Here comes another short Spacejet teaser! Check out, after the break, a quick presentation of my main character’s best friend (tiny spoilers ahead, so proceed at your own risk):

Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under announcement

A Thought on Originality

I often hear people complaining about a story they just read, saying it’s not original, and it pisses me off. I mean, people, what do you expect? This is 2011. We’re not exactly living in the dawn of time. Storytellers around the world have been at it since day one. Everything has been told. It has all been done countless times.

What does it mean for an aspiring storyteller in 2011? Does it mean it is pointless to try? Of course not!

No story needs to be original. Take Romeo and Juliet, for instance. Their story is as old as time. What makes it special is not the details of the plot, it’s the voice of the Bard. Sure, you can point out setting and characterization elements that are particular to that story, but truly, change these while keeping the voice, and it will still be an incredible piece of art.

So you want to write about vampires? Well, yes, of course it has been done. And yes, it has been done by people who are better at it than you will ever be. Should that stop you? Fuck no. You, my dear storyteller, are unique. You are what’s original about your story. Not that vampire, not his sparkly skin, you and the voice you command.

In the end, it all comes down to this: speak with strength and assurance and truthfulness. If you do that and you put the necessary work into the writing, you will eventually succeed. It doesn’t matter if your story has been told a thousand times before. It has never been told by you. The only thing you should avoid doing is trying to tell it in the manner of [insert name of successful novelist]. It won’t work. Imitation will only lead to catastrophic failure.

And it’s true, into every generation a writer is born who will tell a truly original story, the like of which has never been consigned to paper, but what is also true is the chances are slim that this guy is you. And if that guy is you, you still have to tell it in an original voice for it to work. A good story is not enough. It takes a good writer—a good teller.

Speaking of which… if you will excuse me, I’ve got a werewolf story to write.

3 Comments

Filed under blog

Spacejet Launch Day: Dec. 13th

It’s official. I will launch Spacejet on December 13th. Nothing shall stop me. Not injuries, not illness. Not even death or the fucking apocalypse. Tuesday, December 13th, my e-book will be available on Smashwords and most retailers you know and love (details on that will follow closer to launch date). You will also be able to sample the story here, on this website, on a weekly basis (Tuesdays).

As for the retail price, I’m planning on a $1.99 launch price, but I’ll confirm this later. And yes, there will be coupons for y’all extreme couponers out there. In the meantime, I will leave you with this little goodie. This here is the Spacejet cover art:

See you on December 13th! Tell your friend. If they love SF / adventure / humor, they will love this.

Leave a Comment

Filed under announcement

Demand the Tools to Fix Things Ourselves

Like many people today, I have my eyes on the guys who occupy Wall Str. and other places. I see wonderful things there and terrible things also. The former are mostly on the part of the protesters, and the latter are mostly on the part of the police. I won’t go into details; it’s quite obvious what I’m talking about.

What I would like to say, though, is that, I think, they are going at it the wrong way. They have identified issues, and they are demanding that the government solve them. And I think they’re wrong. That doesn’t work. Maybe they will score a few victories, but they will be meaningless in the long run. Power will still be in the hands of the same people. They won’t change.

In my opinion, the protesters should demand one thing and one thing only: a tool.

What should that tool be? It should be a very simple tool, one that every citizen in every civilized nation should have, and it should let them do two things:

  1. give citizens the right to pass laws via referendum ;
  2. give citizens the right to dissolve the assemblies and call for elections.

That way, if the politicians fail to solve an issue, the people can take their tools and use them to fix the nation by themselves. Either that, or fire the slackers and choose new politicians who will do their job.

Some will tell you that if citizens had such a tool it would be anarchy or we would all live in fascist states. Truth is, if citizens around the world had that tool, it would turn the Earth into one big Switzerland. I think we’d survive that.

Leave a Comment

Filed under blog

“Spacejet” Character Introduction (1)

Here comes a little Spacejet teaser for y’all! Check out, after the break, a short presentation of my main character (tiny spoilers ahead, so proceed at your own risk):

Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under announcement

From “people” to “populism”: the Road to Silence

Yesterday I wrote about the meanings of “worker” and “employee” and what going from one to the other implies in terms of alienation (read here). Today, I would like to consider another word, “populism”, and how it has become a bad word.

Nowadays in Europe, if you’re called a populist it means you are trying to excite popular passions to gain political power. It’s nothing more than a milder word for “fascist”. Populists play on the groundless fears and primal hatreds of the people, on xenophobia, on racism.

While that may have been a legitimate concern in the past, the word “populism” is now being used for something else. It tends to vilify any attempt to address the people’s concerns, which are presented as childish and uninformed. In fact, the people no longer have the right to have concerns. They are just a passive bunch that should wait to be educated by the elites, whether they are from the left or the right—lessons are given on both sides. Whatever the people want is misguided. The elites will tell them what they should want.

Now, it’s an interesting journey, the one that “populism” made, because initially, it was a positive word that describeb politicians who cared about the people and their needs. Here, no word was replaced by another (like “worker” being displaced by “employee”). What happened in this instance is “populism” was tainted by associating it with the far right, so that in turn any popular demand could be equated with evil.

The people have become suspect, while the elites pose as righteous. Now isn’t that an interesting twist?

Again, consider to whom this switch in meaning benefits. Certainly not to the people, whose concerns can now be systematically branded as irrelevant, childish or downright evil. “You don’t know what you want, let me explain it to you,” that’s what the elites are saying. What they have done is, basically, suppress our ability to voice our needs and concerns.

So, let me just make one thing clear. The people is never wrong. If you entertain the notion that the people can be wrong, you invalidate the very foundation of democracy. If you think the people shouldn’t make all the decisions, what you are in effect saying is that technocracy is preferable. In a technocracy, the people don’t vote; they are managed.

Now to whom does such a system benefit? Well, one thing is sure. It ain’t you.

Leave a Comment

Filed under blog

From “worker” to “employee”: the Road to Alienation

I’m about to launch an e-book, so it won’t come as a surprise that words matter to me. They are the tools I use to make stories. As such they are of great value to me. They deserve respect. Words, however, are not always used for peaceful activities like storytelling. Like any human invention, in the wrong hands, they can go from tools to weapons.

I could give you many examples of this. I will stick with just one pair for the purpose of this post: the words “worker” and “employee”.

We see them everyday. So much so that we don’t question their meanings anymore. Today, they both imply a person who does a job, and generally the former summons the idea of manual work, while the latter covers the rest. (And yes, it’s not set in stone, but you get it’s the general use I’m referring to.)

Let’s look at them, though, shall we?

“Worker” comes from the verb “work”, obviously (*). It designates a person who performs an action. The suffix -er signals an agent, someone who does something. The worker is in charge of what his hands do.

“Employee” comes from a word that means “to make use of” (**). The “employee” is someone who is made use of, as signaled by the suffix -ee (***). Someone is in charge of the employee and his hands are no longer his.

See what I’m getting at? How did we go from being workers to employees, and what does that say about us, about the world we live in, and about the “employers” who “employ” us. (For the sake of experimentation, replace the words by their simpler counterparts: “user” and “use”. It’s an unpleasant analogy, isn’t it?)

My point is this:

Words shape thoughts, not the other way around. If a word comes to define you, it starts to define how people, including yourself, think about you. Moreover, if a word displaces another, it slowly starts suppressing people’s ability to think certain things rather than others. And I don’t know about you, but I’d rather be a worker, in possession of my own skills, rather than an employee, who just serves a purpose. It doesn’t matter if you have a boss or if you are independent. It’s a matter of conception, of image. Do you work for your boss or are you employed by him? It makes a huge difference.

You may believe that I’m over-thinking this, that it’s not that big a deal. Trust me, there’s no such thing as “over-thinking” (by the way, you might want to reflect on how this word was coined and to what end), and yes, it is a big deal. Alienation is a very big deal. It is the mean by which the ownership of your skills is somehow taken from you.

In our day and age, people tend to think of “worker” is a bad word, one that designates a grunt with greasy hands. It is not trivial that the word that means “he who does a deed” has become a bad word and is replaced in most instances by another that means “he who is used”. In a time when more and more people are joining the Occupy movement, claiming to be the 99% that the 1% should learn to respect, such words have power.

My word of advice: don’t be an employee. It may not be easy to change the circumstances of your lives, but you can easily change the way you see yourself. So, go on! Be a worker. Work is good, work is yours.

1 Comment

Filed under blog